Author: Rosemary Lovelace

17th Sunday after Pentecost – Bill Harkins

Proper 19, Year B

The Collect of the Day

O God, because without you we are not able to please you, mercifully grant that your Holy Spirit may in all things direct and rule our hearts; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and forever.Amen.

The Gospel: Mark 8:27-38 Jesus went on with his disciples to the villages of Caesarea Philippi; and on the way he asked his disciples, “Who do people say that I am?” And they answered him, “John the Baptist; and others, Elijah; and still others, one of the prophets.” He asked them, “But who do you say that I am?” Peter answered him, “You are the Messiah.” And he sternly ordered them not to tell anyone about him…Then he began to teach them that the Son of Man must undergo great suffering, and be rejected by the elders, the chief priests, and the scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again. He said all this quite openly. And Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him. But turning and looking at his disciples, he rebuked Peter and said, “Get behind me, Satan! For you are setting your mind not on divine things, but on human things.” He called the crowd with his disciples, and said to them, “If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me. For those who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake, and for the sake of the gospel, will save it. For what will it profit them to gain the whole world and forfeit their life? Indeed, what can they give in return for their life? Those who are ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of them the Son of Man will also be ashamed when he comes in the glory of his Father with the holy angels.”

In the Name of the God of Creation, who loves us all….Amen. Good morning, and welcome to Holy Family on this 17^th Sunday after Pentecost. We are glad you are here, and if you are visiting this morning please do let us know so we can get to know you. Today we hear a challenging Gospel text from Mark who reminds us, through Peter, of the ups and downs and vicissitudes of discipleship, and the courage that is required of us all, especially when we are not sure where we are, or where we are going. On this long sojourn into Pentecost, we’ve heard about the emerging ministry of Jesus; the miracles, the healing, the feeding of thousands, the calling of the disciples. Mid-way on the journey is Peter’s remarkable declaration, “You are the Messiah,” the first time anyone has stated exactly who Jesus is. It is a journey of trust, and contains all of the challenges of being steadfast amidst uncertainty. As we heard today, this declaration results in some unexpected consequences, especially for Peter. I find myself identifying with him, however, and this may say more about me than Peter, but I certainly have no trouble thinking of times when I took a journey that ended up quite differently than I had intended. The mantra of my trail running group is “Conditions may vary.” Perhaps you, too, have found yourself lost at times, uncertain which way to go. I can only imagine what the disciples must have felt before Peter’s declaration, “You are the Christ.” There must have been a good deal of uncertainty and speculation about exactly who this man Jesus might be, and of course, following Jesus often took the disciples into new territory. Perhaps there were times when they thought, “This is not exactly what I signed up for on this trip,” and, “What was I thinking?” When Jesus told them that he was to be rejected, abused, and even murdered, Peter, perhaps fearing for his own life, rebuked Jesus. He could not imagine such a thing happening to his Messiah. Maybe Peter envisioned the great and powerful things that Jesus would do when his “Messiah-ship” came to its fruition. Perhaps he even imagined himself standing beside Jesus as a trusted assistant, sharing the glory of the throne. Surely suffering was not a part of Peter’s dream for Jesus, or for himself or the others. And that humanity is, I suspect, one of the reasons we are drawn to Peter throughout the Gospel accounts. We can easily see ourselves acting likewise. We know that taking up one’s cross is no easy task. Some of them went into hiding. Peter denied Jesus… his head denying what his heart knew was true. They were all weary, and afraid, and uncertain. And come to that, none of us can know what lies before us, or what will be asked of us in the days or years ahead. But we can reflect on the nature of our discipleship. We can make choices on our journey by trusting not so much our sense of “reason,” but rather Jesus, who calls us to be in discipleship and promises we will not be alone. 

Incidentally, those English scholars among us will recognize that in the passage from Mark Jesus says, “If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.” The “deny yourself” in this passage has no direct object. We often believe we need to deny ourselves “something.” Yet, I wonder if this is necessary. This passage does not refer to a denial of anything. Paradoxically, this denial of one thing or another actually has the opposite effect of causing us to focus on too much on ourselves. Perhaps the best way to deny ourselves is by getting ourselves off our hands, doing the work we have to do, so that when we are called to do God’s work, our issues do not get in the way. Maybe this is what Jesus means when he says we must “lose ourselves in order to find ourselves.”

I want to tell you a story about the small mountain parish I served many years ago, as a Postulant. The rector, my boss at the time, gave me an assignment to create a new lay ministry for the parish. Since I was at the time a professor of pastoral care, I developed and taught a course on “Lay Pastoral Care,” designed to equip lay persons with theory and skills in pastoral care, and to empower them to use these skills in the community—both in the church, and beyond. We began carefully with the theological summons of our Baptismal Covenant. In that Covenant we promise “…to seek and serve Christ in all persons, loving your neighbor as yourself…to strive for justice and peace among all people, and to respect the dignity of every human being.”[1]

Over the course of the next few months the enthusiasm for the class was palpable and inspiring. Together we began to imagine the possibilities for the harvest that might follow our seasons of learning about grief counseling, visitation in hospitals, continuous care facilities and care for the chronically ill, as well as elder care, a “casserole patrol” as a form of crisis ministry, Lay Eucharistic visitation, and other forms of pastoral care. By summer, we proposed to the Vestry the parameters of a new ministry of Lay Pastoral Care. This was subsequently approved. New life in community suddenly existed where none had previously been in the service of “bearing one another’s burdens,” to use Paul’s language. We were delighted.

Soon, however, problems began to emerge. Some became worried about best practices and methodology, others about who among them had the best and most appropriate gifts and graces for particular forms of ministry, and why. This was typically born of fears of inadequacy, not unusual when we are learning new skills of course. Opinions about overlapping forms of care and responsibility threatened to overshadow the reasons the ministry was created in the first place. Even the clergy staff began to disagree about what the laity should, and should not be “allowed” to do. In some instances these debates took on a personal tone, and feelings were hurt. Persons were becoming preoccupied with the letter of the “law” rather than the spirit of compassionate life in community we sought to embody. Our communal efforts at bearing one another’s burdens were becoming a burden to us all.

In his interaction with Peter, Jesus is reminding us that one thing is needed—the focus on the “so what” of our sojourns as Christian. And we recall that in the midst of the crisis of the young church seeking to become established, Paul encourages the giving of oneself in faithful service, gratitude, and humility rather than arrogance, hubris, and emphasis on differences based on one’s particular spiritual gifts and graces. For Paul, life in community should be governed by faithful stewardship of all resources, a stewardship marked by “sowing to the spirit.” 

Well, a while after the formation of the Lay Pastoral Care Ministry, one of the “founding” members was unexpectedly stricken ill. En route to London on a plane high over the Atlantic, this parishioner had a life-threatening heart attack, was resuscitated, and kept alive by CPR until the plane returned to New York. She was stabilized in hospital there and eventually returned to a lengthy convalescence at home in the mountains. Somehow, this crisis in the community provided the occasion for all the hopes and expectations originally envisioned for the Lay Pastoral Care ministry to emerge and coalesce around her care. The various committees sprang into action without rancor or emphasis on whom should do what, or why. The gifts and abilities inherent in the committee seemed to sort themselves out, emerge, and come to life. Tasks were delegated, carried out, and engaged with enthusiasm and faithfulness. A spirit of grace prevailed. Lay ministers devotedly brought her the Eucharist, and all of their ministry skills blossomed.

Our experience with the Lay Pastoral Care ministry—a ministry thriving in that parish to this day—called us back to our Baptismal Covenant. We were reminded that compassion is a practical pastoral virtue that transcends law, and invokes grace in action, joy in the spirit. It respects the dignity of all human beings. Yes, and compassion, born of grace, is the virtue that sustains, no matter what our reception in the towns and villages to which we may be sent. One of my favorite quotes is that Transformation happens at the cellular level.” This is true when we exercise, and when we engage in small acts of compassion—the small, daily acts and expressions of transformation that have the power to change the world, and ourselves in it. As Richard Rohr says, “Sooner or later, if you are on any classic “spiritual schedule,” some event, person, death, idea, or relationship will enter your life with which you simply cannot cope using your present skill set, acquired knowledge, or willpower. Spiritually speaking, you will be led to the edge of your own private resources.” This is in part what Peter faced in today’s Gospel…he was bumping up against his own limitations. And like Peter, one must “lose” at something, and then begin to develop the art of losing.This is the only way that Life/Fate/God/Grace/Mystery can get us to change, let go of our egocentric preoccupations—deny ourselves, to use today’s Gospel language—and go on the further and larger journey. We must stumble and fall. Because, until we are led to the limits of our present game plan and find it to be insufficient, we will not search out or find our real Source. Alcoholics Anonymous calls it the Higher Power. Jesus calls this Ultimate Source the “living water” at the bottom of the well (see John 4:10-14). Oh, and that mountain parish I served so many years ago was our own beloved Holy Family. And already, in this season of transition, new ministries are being born and new forms of stewardship—those gifts of time, talent, and giving in so many ways so important to the life of this parish—are being created. So please give prayerful consideration to how you might contribute. In the next few weeks we will be sharing stories of grace, and hospitality, and opportunities for serving. This is not so much an old school stewardship narrative as it is an imaginative, generative invitation to give of ourselves—and in so doing—being transformed. So many good things are happening here my friends, and perhaps you have gifts for music, or leadership, or hospitality…or even pastoral care, that even you may not have been aware you had! Listen to the words of the poet David Whyte, a poem about thoughtful, incarnational stewardship, about denying oneself, and finding oneself becoming fully alive:

Our great mistake is to act the drama

as if we were alone. As if life

were a progressive and cunning crime

with no witness to the tiny hidden

transgressions. To feel abandoned is to deny

the intimacy of your surroundings. Surely,

even you, at times, have felt the grand array;

the swelling presence, and the chorus, crowding

out your solo voice. You must note

the way the soap dish enables you,

or the window latch grants you freedom.

Alertness is the hidden discipline of familiarity.

The stairs are your mentor of things

to come, the doors have always been there

to frighten you and invite you,

and the tiny speaker in the phone

is your dream-ladder to divinity.

Put down the weight of your aloneness and ease into the

conversation. The kettle is singing

even as it pours you a drink, the cooking pots

have left their arrogant aloofness and

seen the good in you at last. All the birds

and creatures of the world are unutterably

themselves. Everything is waiting for you.

Amen. [1] The Book of Common Prayer, The Episcopal Church, (1979) Church Publishing Incorporated, New York, New York, pp. 304-305. 

16th Sunday after Pentecost – Bill Harkins

Proper 18, Year B

The Collect of the Day Grant us, O Lord, to trust in you with all our hearts; for, as you always resist the proud who confide in their own strength, so you never forsake those who make their boast of your mercy; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen.  

The Gospel: Mark 7:24-37 Jesus set out and went away to the region of Tyre. He entered a house and did not want anyone to know he was there. Yet he could not escape notice, but a woman whose little daughter had an unclean spirit immediately heard about him, and she came and bowed down at his feet. Now the woman was a Gentile, of Syrophoenician origin. She begged him to cast the demon out of her daughter. He said to her, “Let the children be fed first, for it is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.” But she answered him, “Sir, even the dogs under the table eat the children’s crumbs.” Then he said to her, “For saying that, you may go—the demon has left your daughter.” So she went home, found the child lying on the bed, and the demon gone…    

Dear Sister in Christ:  

It must seem strange to be getting a letter some 2000 years after your courageous encounter with Jesus of Nazareth. I write to you out of deep admiration for your story. I confess that I am also writing because this is what I tell others to do when they are confused about how they feel, or in need of clarity about a way forward in the midst of a messy, uncomfortable situation. The story of your effort to get help for your daughter that day is still told by many, and it may please you to know that it is written in a book called the Holy Bible—and in a chapter in that book called the Gospel of Mark. I had not read your story in quite a while, and for some reason, this time as I read, it made me sad, and uncomfortable. I should probably mention that I am a teacher, and a priest—though not the kind of priest you would have been familiar with—and a counselor. So part of my discomfort comes from feeling that I should know just the right thing to say, or feel, or think to explain away my discomfort. Yet, I do not. In reading your story again I was struck not only by how uncomfortable it made me, but how much I admired you, and how many questions I had about your encounter with Jesus. In fact, I had so many different feelings and questions that I found myself not wanting to think about your story at all. This made me even more uncomfortable, but it also made me curious. You see this, too, is part of my training—to be willing to ask tough questions in relation to things that make us want to look the other way, things we would rather ignore, or deny, and pretend will go away if we do so. I imagined different ways of understanding and “interpreting” your encounter with Jesus so that this might take away my discomfort. Yet, I could not. And, come to that, I wonder if perhaps we are called by the Gospel to feel uncomfortable at times. So, the only way to proceed seemed to be that of being as transparent as possible, and let your story stand on its own, even if it meant being scared, and angry, and uncertain, and even if it meant that those with whom I share this had some of these feelings as well… so, I decided to write you a letter. I should also confess that I am a person of privilege in my country. Unlike you I do not really know what it is like to be overlooked because of race, or gender, or skin color. I have not known real hunger—and I have never had to wonder where my next meal was coming from. I have not been passed over for a job because of the color of my skin, or because of my gender. I have not been discriminated against or overlooked in spite of the content of my character—and yet I imagine this was a way of life for you. In fact, it occurs to me as I write to you that although I have told you my name, I do not even know yours. You are often referred to as “a Canaanite woman,” or “a certain woman.” In what we call Mark’s Gospel—another version of your story—you are referred to as the “Syro-Phoenician woman.” In my country, if you have to say you are African American or Native American or Latino American, you already know you are often more subject to being overlooked, on the margins, ignored. I suspect you knew this feeling quite well. I don’t ever recall feeling the need to refer to myself as White American, or Euro American. In Matthew’s version of your story, in which you are referred to as “a Canaanite woman,” this meant that you were marginalized in the world of Judaism—both as a Canaanite and as a woman. You would have been considered the property of your husband or your father. And in spite of this—in spite of the fact that race, gender, class, and nationalism were all working against you, you approached a group of men—also taboo, and you kept doing so; and why? Perhaps you were a single mother—why else would you have made the journey on your own—why would your husband or some other male advocate not speak for you as custom demanded? And being a single mother, your position would have been even more tenuous—with virtually no status or material resources. It must have been embarrassing and uncomfortable for everyone concerned, including you, and clearly the disciples in the story are aggravated by your persistence—in Matthews version of your story, they even warned Jesus to ignore you—“Send her away,” they said, “for she keeps shouting after us.” They turned their backs on you, and yet you persisted. We are different in all these and so many more ways, you and I, but I do know what it is like to be a parent—I am the father of two sons. That part of your story got my attention as well. I know what t it is like to sit up all night with a sick child, and to huddle in a hospital emergency room scared, and desperate for the healing of a child. I know what it is like to suffer with and for my children. I also understand why you approached Jesus and why you sought him out in your time of need. You did this for the very same reason that so many over the past 2000 years have done so—for healing, for strength, for sustenance, for release from the powers of darkness, and for wholeness of mind, body, and spirit—for community….for embrace—rather than exclusion. In fact it is for these reasons that we gather this morning, in my community of worship, and it is for this reason I am sharing my letter with those whom I serve. No doubt you heard of Jesus by word of mouth. Again and again he was moved by compassion to take action, do justice, work miracles. Surely this is what you heard, too. You expected compassion, and justice, and kindness. And not for you, but for your daughter who was suffering. So, against all odds and all that was working against you, you persisted. Even as I admire and respect you, I am troubled by Jesus’ behavior. “Have mercy on me O Lord, son of David,” you cried, and he tried to ignore you altogether, and yet you persisted. I wonder how he could ignore you and then dismiss you? There is no way to clean up this story, no way to sanitize it or explain it away. I’ve heard some very learned people try to do so, and it cannot be done, it always has a hollow sound. And your willingness to be vulnerable allows me to see and hear what I too would rather ignore. “I have come only for the lost sheep of Israel,” Jesus finally said—I am here to help only those who are like me. Still you persisted, kneeling before him, and in what is at one and the same time incredible humility and vulnerability, and remarkable courage, you say “Lord, help me.” And then, this unbelievable statement from our Christ—“It is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.” For a brief moment you were turned away, and my heart sinks. Just as those with whom I am sharing this letter feel in coming to church, you expected the experience of the sacred grace of God in coming to Jesus. Just as we feel wounded or hurt if we are dismissed and overlooked by brothers and sisters in Christ, you would have by all rights felt crushed, devastated, defeated. How could Jesus compare anyone to a dog? How could he say, in effect, some don’t belong at the table, or even beneath it—some don’t deserve the bread—some are outside the circle of care and compassion—his love is only for those within the circle? How could he do this when so often he told us that all are welcome at the table? And still you persisted. Kneeling before him, even more vulnerable, you spoke up and said to him in a remarkably witty and articulate response—“Yet even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from the master’s table.” You should know if you do not already, that many have followed in your footsteps. Your courage and determination echo down through the halls of history for all women and men whose opportunities were denied by virtue of gender, race, or social status.  A woman named Sojourner Truth, born a slave, once said “That man there, he says women can’t have as much rights as men, because Christ wasn’t a woman. Where did Christ come from? From God and a woman…and ain’t I a Woman? I have born 13 children and seen most all sold into slavery, and when I cried out none but Jesus heard me.” Others followed—women such as Rosa Parks, and Ruby Bridges, and so many other “certain women” who took up your cause. And finally, blessedly, Jesus heard you. He came to himself and in so doing extended his ministry beyond the Jews to include us all. He had behaved as he had because he could—because in his culture he had power and status and it pains me to think how often I have unthinkingly done the same. But at last he exclaimed “Woman, great is your faith. Let it be done as you desire.” And your daughter was healed as you must have known she would be. Do you know that I cannot recall another place in the Gospels where someone won a theological argument with Jesus? Do you know that you were the bearer of Good News to the One who gave Good News to us? In that instant his soul was enlarged, his compassion deepened, the love at the center of His message bloomed ever brighter. By his willingness to learn, to change his mind, He taught us that we are here to grow, to learn, and to be open to the grace-filled movement of the Holy Spirit in our lives. You, with humility and confidence, deference and boldness, and a deep abiding belief that God’s love will transcend the obstacles that would keep us in bondage—taught him, and by extension all of us. Well, it is almost time for me to close this letter. In the church I serve, the center of all that we do is called the Eucharist. We gather at the table and celebrate with bread and wine what you helped me see in a new way through your story. We come to that table, each of us, as God’s children, with an advocate in Christ Jesus much as you advocated for your daughter. And we receive the bread from the top of the table, not the crumbs from beneath. In so doing we, like you, receive the gift of grace, of God’s love—an ever present reminder that we are not excluded by God… no, not one of us, by virtue of gender, or race, or sexual orientation, or political affiliation or any other boundary that would alienate, divide, or separate us from the love of God. I give thanks in gratitude that in your story, I now see more clearly that this is a good practice in relation to all that we do: especially all that we do in the service of doing justice, loving kindness, walking humbly with our God—and respecting the dignity of every human being. Thank you.   Your brother in Christ, Bill

15th Sunday adter Pentecost – Bill Harkins

Proper 17, Year B

The Collect of the Day

Lord of all power and might, the author and giver of all good things: Graft in our hearts the love of your Name; increase in us true religion; nourish us with all goodness; and bring forth in us the fruit of good works; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God for ever and ever.Amen.

The Gospel: Mark 7:1-8, 14-15, 21-23

When the Pharisees and some of the scribes who had come from Jerusalem gathered around him, they noticed that some of his disciples were eating with defiled hands, that is, without washing them. (For the Pharisees, and all the Jews, do not eat unless they thoroughly wash their hands, thus observing the tradition of the elders; and they do not eat anything from the market unless they wash it; and there are also many other traditions that they observe, the washing of cups, pots, and bronze kettles.) So the Pharisees and the scribes asked him, “Why do your disciples not live according to the tradition of the elders, but eat with defiled hands?” He said to them, “Isaiah prophesied rightly about you hypocrites, as it is written, ‘This people honors me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching human precepts as doctrines.’ You abandon the commandment of God and hold to human tradition.” Then he called the crowd again and said to them, “Listen to me, all of you, and understand: there is nothing outside a person that by going in can defile, but the things that come out are what defile.” For it is from within, from the human heart, that evil intentions come: fornication, theft, murder, adultery, avarice, wickedness, deceit, licentiousness, envy, slander, pride, folly. All these evil things come from within, and they defile a person.”

In the Name of the God of Creation who loves us all…Amen. Good morning, and welcome to Holy Family on this fifteenth Sunday after Pentecost. We are so glad you have chosen to spend part of your Labor Day weekend with us, and if you are visiting today, we hope you have found or will find a home among us! Welcome, grace, and peace to each of you this day!

In the Gospel appointed for today, we have a dialogue that may on the surface seem alien to us, with its surface theme of physical holiness and its connection to our religious practices. In one sense this is like being invited into a family squabble and it can be tempting to excuse oneself and quietly exit. To do so would be to miss the deeper message here, however—a message about choosing and living out what it means to be in right relationship, respecting the dignity of every human being, and treating others with kindness and respect. And this starts with taking a look at oneself, being mindful of our own, sometimes egotistical desires, and keeping the welfare of the common good in focus, and as the ultimate goal of our core values.

Lately, thanks to my dear friend and colleague Martha Sterne, I’ve been re-reading Eudora Welty’s wonderful book “The Optimist’s Daughter.”  Maybe you remember the story. It is the memoir of Laurel McKelva Hand, a woman in her mid-forties, trying to come to terms with the deaths of all those she has most loved in life: her mother, her father, and her husband Phil, who was killed in World War II. At one point in the novel, Laurel remembers a train ride she took with her then fiancé Phil, from Chicago, Illinois to Mount Salus, Mississippi, where they were to be married. Miss Welty writes:

When they were climbing the long approach to a bridge after leaving Cairo, rising slowly higher until they rode above the tops of bare trees, she looked down and saw the pale light widening and the river bottoms opening out, and then the water appearing, reflecting the low, early sun. There were two rivers. Here was where they came together. This was the confluence of the waters, the Ohio and the Mississippi…All they could see was sky, water, birds, light, and confluence. It was the whole morning world….And they themselves were part of the confluence. Their own joint act of faith had brought them here at the very moment and matched its occurrence, and proceeded as it proceeded. Direction itself was made beautiful, momentous. They were riding as one with it, right up front. It’s our turn! she’d thought exultantly. And we’re going to live forever…Left …of a death made of water and fire in a year long gone, Phil could tell her of her life. For her life, any life, she had to believe, was nothing but the continuity of its love.

Oh, my. Such lovely writing, and in the last line I quoted, about how any life is “nothing but the continuity of its love,” there is a deep and abiding connection to the Gospel for today. And I find myself drawn to that one word Miss Welty used repeatedly, “confluence,” a noun meaning “a flowing together of two or more streams; the point of juncture of such streams; the combined stream formed by this juncture; a tributary.” Confluence is not a religious word; you won’t find it anywhere in the Bible. Nevertheless, the stories of our faith are filled with moments of confluence – the place or point in time in which God and human beings come together. In the text for today that confluence was a call to search our hearts, and to mindfully breathe new life in to our practices and disciplines so they sustain and nurture those things that lead to life-giving results.

I believe Jesus is calling us in this text to lives of integrity—the Latin root is “integritas,” and my favorite interpretation of this is “wholeness.” After all, we get similar words such as “integers,” or whole numbers, and “integration,” to bring together into whole cloth, from this same Latin root. In responding as he does to the Pharisees—and in referring as he does to the heart, thought to be the center of one’s capacity for courage and compassion—Jesus is asking us to consider the heart of our own faith and tradition, and the practices and disciplines that sustain it in wholeness.   Begging the question, what activities, ritual and otherwise, help us be in right relationship with our neighbors, practicing hospitality, and grace? What allows us to maintain and deepen what theologian Paul Tillich referred to as “self-integration,” that process of finding our center of spiritual health and moral integrity? For Tillich this corresponded to a therapeutic model familiar to pastoral counselors…that one’s spiritual health is the wholeness of a person’s center, the “ground of one’s being” as Tillich called it. In this sense, Jesus may be asking us to pay attention not so much to what we eat, or to Levitical laws, but rather to ask what may be eating us. This is why Jesus says, “All these evil things come from within.” The Family Therapist and Rabbi Edwin Friedman once said; “grief that is not transformed gets transmitted.” So often, as a clinician, I see the effects of swallowing grief, or anger, or fear, rather than transforming them into life-giving possibilities. When we do this, our anger and grief, pushed down, inevitably come out in ways hurtful to others, and to ourselves. And come to that, how might we understand in a new way that when we celebrate the Eucharist—as we will in just a moment—we do so sharing in time and space that first Eucharist, and this one here and now, and all those to come, as if time is in those moments is standing still, which in fact it is doing. And in that moment, we are invited to leave at the altar those things which might keep us in bondage, and embrace the wholeness of our common humanity in Christ. I hear Jesus’ familiar and comforting words, I have called you friends…yes once again, but I am not the same person who heard them before. As Nobel Laureate and poet Czeslaw Milosz says”

Love means to learn to look at yourself

The way one looks at distant things

For you are only one thing among many.

And whoever sees that way heals his heart,

Without knowing it, from various ills—

A bird and a tree say to him: Friend.

Then he wants to use himself and things

So that they stand in the glow of ripeness.

It doesn’t matter whether he knows what he serves:

Who serves best doesn’t always understand.

Now, I don’t know exactly what Milosz means by “standing the glow of ripeness” but I very much like this phrase. It speaks to a theology of abundance rather than scarcity. It means being patient with one another and erring on the side of grace and curiosity rather than criticism and judgment. This is the journey of the Paschal mystery, and the hope of the strength, courage, and resilience to abide with one another in love. It’s what gives us space to celebrate the Eucharist at this table, and to wish our Jewish brothers and sister a blessed Rosh Hashanah next month, and to endeavor to pray for both our Jewish and Palestinian sisters and brothers, and those in Sudan, because when we heal our heart as Milosz suggests, and we give ourselves away in love, we are not trapped in dualistic, binary ways of being in the world. Rather than either/or, it’s both/and. Rather than a theology of scarcity, we practice abundance, an abundance on full display in the passage from the Song of Solomon we heard read so well just now. Let’s promise not to let our religious practices and convictions become so entrenched and mundane that we have forgotten the deeper, life-giving meaning to which they point. Let’s remember to err on the side of love, and even if we have firm beliefs about what it means to be church, let’s remember in this season of transition to show up, pay attention, speak the truth in love with grace, and let go of attachment to agendas and outcomes we cannot control. Let’s be kind to one another, especially while we are in this liminal time of transition as a parish—as we know that times of change are often rife with criticism and judgment borne of anxiety and old narratives, wounds, and unfinished business. We will be fine as long as we work together with grace, and understanding, and patience. Those things that most irritate us about others are often opportunities to learn more about ourselves, and where we have what Carl Jung called “shadow work” to do. As Jesus says, the things that come out—often when we least expect it—“are the things that defile.” There is a lovely African American spiritual, the words of which go something like this: Deep River, My home is over Jordan. Deep river, Lord. I want to cross over into campground. Campground is that home where we make choices that lead to the confluences of the continuity of love, to use Eudora Welty’s lovely language, and choices give us agency. It is, like the Eucharist, a moveable feast. There, we seek to live lives of integrity, and be faithful to our Baptismal Covenant to respect the dignity of every human being, and in so doing mindfully reflect God’s loving intentions for all of humanity. It is that place from which we extend compassion, and thereby open ourselves to deeper understandings of who we are in relationship to God, self and other.Together, my sisters and brothers, we can do this with courage—with heart—and without building walls that would keep out those who are different from ourselves. After all, any life is nothing but the continuity of its love. And we can love completely without complete understanding. We can place more importance on being in relationship, with love, than on being right. On this Eudora Welty, and Jesus, agree. Amen.

14th Sunday after Pentecost – Ted Hackett

John 6:51-58

It’s nice to be back up here …

As many of you know I have been pretty much out of circulation for a few months…

As we age we become like old cars…

The parts wear out…

Some they can replace…

Some they can fix for a while…

And some just…

have to give out!

I won’t waste your time with details…

Corner me privately if you want and I’ll bore you with my ailments

But to the matter at hand…

the Gospel readings…

The last two Sundays…and today…Our Gospel readings are from the 6th chapter of John…

They are really quite mystifying if you read them closely…

  Now that’s partly because these readings, are from three different sources…

John had at least three different traditions to deal with…

All of them dealing with the Eucharist…

Three different Churches…

Probably all in the region of Ephesus in what is now Turkey…

There were probably several Christian communities around Ephesus…it was a pretty big city…

And each may have had slightly different traditions by the year 95 when this Gospel was written…

John wrote this Gospel in part to unite these communities…to keep them from arguing…

So when you read John’s Gospel…

It often seems disjointed and perhaps even self-contradictory, because it is put together with pieces from each tradition…

Now in today’s readings…it is clear that John is trying to clarify something about what each of these Churches do every Sunday….the Holy Eucharist…but about which they have disagreements..

Disagreements about just what the Eucharist is and how the Eucharist brings Jesus…

The real Jesus…

Brings Jesus to us! 

And how does John believe this happens?

Remember…John is trying to justify several traditions…….

For instance, last week’s Gospel has Jesus saying: “I am the bread of life. Who ever comes to me will never be hungry and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty.”

It’s very easy to read this metaphorically.

It’s very easy to think that Jesus is just saying that hunger and thirst are metaphors for spiritual things…

Even so, the Pharisees in the audience are offended.

They know Jesus is the son of Mary and Joseph and as far as they are concerned he did not come down from heaven!

This is typical of John’s Gospel…

Jesus says something profound and his listeners…take him to be speaking literally and just don’t get it!

And what Jesus says two weeks ago sounds like a metaphor.

But… a bit later on in the same Chapter 6… the Gospel from last week, we find something quite different…

Jesus’ words are far less rhetorical.

Listen again…

Jesus says:

“I am the living bread that came down from Heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh” … “Very truly I tell you unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood you have no life in you! Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood have eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day; for my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink. Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide in me and I in them. … Whoever eats me will live because of me.

Now…that is pretty graphic stuff!

And it sounds very much like primitive, barbarian ideas…

The sort of things cannibals believe…

Eat the body of a dead man and magically gain his power…

It’s no wonder the Pharisees did not “get it”…“How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”

A very reasonable question!

As a matter of fact…it is precisely one of things the Church has been arguing about for about 2,000 years. ….

“How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”

We don’t have time to explore the ins and outs of this question of how this could happen….

Just believe me, that for 2,000 years…

Christians have argued with each other…

Have excommunicated each other…

Have executed each other…

Have even fought wars over this question…

Theologians have yelled at each other…

Have written volumes trying to reconcile the issue of Christ’s Presence in the Eucharist with logic…or Science…or for that matter…

             Common Sense!….

Thomas Aquinas gave us an elegant, learned theory…which is almost always misunderstood…

Goes by the name “Transubstantiation”…

But it has a fatal flaw…

If anyone wants to talk about that…again…corner me and we’ll talk about substance and accidents.

The great Reformer…father of most Protestant thinking about the Eucharist, Ulrich Zwingli…

Said it was a matter of what you believed…             

If you believed Christ was present that was as good as his really being there…

Martin Luther insisted that Jesus wasn’t lying when He said: “This is my body…” and we just have to take it on faith…

And Anglicanism…that is our tradition…

Has said: “We strongly profess all theories….but the important thing is to do it….”….and then grow into understanding.

To celebrate it and to be open to what   God would have us believe… 

And that is pretty much what we do…..

And that is worth exploring…..

Let’s look at a sort of “case history”…

Let’s say a young woman “falls in love”                            

Or we could say she is infatuated…

Her perception of him is dazzling!

But….she doesn’t know him very well.

Courtship…to use an old-fashioned word…

Is a process of really knowing a person better And she does find out things about him…

Some she is not fond of…..

He is always late…stuff like that…

But basically…she likes what she discovers…

And infatuation…almost without her noticing …

Deepens…

and turns to love.

Of course…this is ideal…Happily ever after…

But life is life…

And after a while…she finds things are not always peaches and cream…

It isn’t that he is abusive or unfaithful

But….he doesn’t always anticipate her needs…and fulfill them. He forgets their anniversary!

Sometimes he is distracted…

and doesn’t attend to her.

Sometimes…

When she wants something…                 

He says: “No,

We can’t afford it!”

It doesn’t seem like a perfect relationship anymore.

She begins to have fantasies of finding someone else who could fulfill all her wishes…

But then…One day when she is feeling pretty down…

She starts to cry…

And she realizes that he is there…beside her…

And the whole time she has been feeling lonely…

He has been right there…

She just wasn’t open to knowing it…

Maybe she was too self-occupied…

Maybe she was still in the fantasy-land of first love….quite adolescent!

But now…somehow…in her need…

He is there…

And she knows…

He loves her.

And that is how it is for many people I have known…..

For many it is the story of coming to know Our Lord is there for us …

Especially in the holy Eucharist…

First… when we go to Communion it seems like a really nice piece of Symbolism…

We may find it comforting…even a bit fascinating….but not life-changing.

But then…if we keep on…maybe…

Maybe things deepen…and we begin to…somehow…know…that he is really, somehow…in that bread and wine….

It can be a strange feeling…

A little scary…

But amazing.

But it doesn’t last…

It can be fleeting…

It cannot be summoned at will…

It can seem like it was an illusion…

But then…maybe in a time of fear or sadness…we find out that our sense of Jesus’ presence in the Eucharist is real…

He is with us…

He is with us…even when we don’t know it…

When we don’t feel it.

And he is with us…

In the Eucharist

It’s O.K. if all this doesn’t happen to you…

God doesn’t judge you for it…you are no less a Christian…

This sort of thing is, after all, a gift from God…

We have to cooperate….but it is a gift.

But it is worth waiting for…

And like any coming of Jesus,

Without seeming to change anything… It changes everything.

13th Sunday after Pentecost – Byron Tindall

Ephesus

The city of Ephesus is located in the western part of what is now Turkey, across the Aegean Sea from Athens, Greece. Back when this letter was penned, Ephesus was a major commercial center and the capital of the Roman province of Asia. It needs to be noted that this is not the same as the present-day continent of Asia.

Ephesus was no small wide spot in the Roman Empire. It boasted an amphitheater that seated nearly 25,000 spectators. It was also home to the magnificent Temple of Artemis mentioned in Acts 19:27. This edifice was also known as the Temple of Diana.

According to the Acts of the Apostles’, Paul visited Ephesus on his second missionary journey as well as on his third journey. During that third journey, he stayed in the city for two to three years.

There is some disagreement between Biblical scholars as to whether or not Paul actually wrote the Letter to the Ephesians. A good case can be made for saying that Paul did write the letter. A just as strong position is available to those who say someone else is the author. I’ll not get into that discussion any further at this time.

Ephesus, prior to the introduction of Christianity, was what we would call a pagan city. The arrival of Christianity caused “no little disturbance” among the residents who made their living with practices deemed demonic or idolatrous by Christians.

This section of the Letter to the Ephesians read this morning. pretty well sums up how a Christian was supposed to live.

It’s generally accepted that the followers of Jesus were called Christians by the time this letter was composed. Prior to being called Christians, the disciples were known as “Followers of the Way.”

We read in Acts 11:26, “and when he (Barnabas) had found him, (Paul), he brought him to Antioch. So it was that for an entire year they associated with the church and taught a great many people, and it was in Antioch that the disciples were first called ‘Christians.’

Paul first visited Antioch in about 44. His lengthy visit to Ephesus is believed to have taken place some 10-12 years later.

End of history lesson. “So, what’s this got to do with us today?” you may very well be asking yourself at this point in time.

Well, I’m going out on a limb and say the words Christian and Christianity have been hijacked in the world in which we live today. Let me explain what I mean by that.

One can pick a belief, no matter how far off from what Jesus showed us, and find a quote church unquote that supports that belief.

Both the Old and New Testaments tell us how to treat the sojourner in our midst. But yet…

Jesus, by word and deed, showed what He thought about the outcast, the abused, the lonely, the poor, the sinner, the downtrodden, the sick, the hungry, those in prison, the environment, women, and children. He actually showed more than a little disdain for the powerful, the elite and even organized religion.

There was a movement a few years ago, especially among younger Christians, called WWJD (What would Jesus do?). Its followers were supposed to ask themselves what Jesus would do when faced with a similar situation. It worked well if the proponents went back to Jesus’s life to get the answer rather than listen to the tapes instilled by a particular branch of Christianity.

I’m in no way saying that all of Christianity has gone astray. I am saying that certain segments seem to have forgotten what Jesus taught and the road down which He led and leads us if we’re following Him.

I try to be open to the way others believe.

But when members of a certain congregation located in Kansas rejoice at the death of a member of the LBGQT community, I question how they can call themselves Christians. This same group of people protest at funerals for members of the armed forces. Really! Is this how Jesus would react under similar circumstances?

When politicians appeal to fellow Christians who think like them for votes, I become a little more than upset.

I have more than a little problem with anyone who tries to limit God’s loving, saving embrace to those who think like they do. Those who look like they do. Those who speak like they do. Those who live like they do. Those who love like they do.

Who do we think we are when we arrogantly tell our Creator who He can and who He can’t love.

I worship and hopefully follow, the God of Love, not some god of hate. Our Presiding Bishop so rightly reminded us that “if it’s not about love, it’s not about God.”

If St. Paul were to write a letter to the churches in the United States, I can only guess how he would start it. “Grace to you and peace in our Lord Jesus Christ. We have a huge problem…”

There have always been and still are many Followers of the Way.

In my way of thinking, a few of the contemporary or almost contemporaries of our time include: Dietrich Bonhoffer, C.S. Lewis, Martin Luther King, Jr., Jonathan M. Daniels and his companions, Desmond Tutu, Richard Rohr, The Most Rev. Michael Curry, The Rt. Rev. Rob Wright. And the list could go on and on and on. There are many members of Holy Family who could be included in this list.

There’s a meme running around on Facebook that I like.

“It’s not the task of the church to ‘make America great again.’ The contemporary task of the church is to make Christianity countercultural again. And once we untether Jesus from the interests of empire, we begin to see just how countercultural and radical Jesus’ ideas actually are. Enemies? Love them. Violence? Renounce it. Money? Share it. Foreigners? Welcome them. Sinners? Forgive them. These are the kind of radical ideas that will always be opposed by the principalities and powers, but which the followers of Jesus are called to embrace, announce, and enact.” We have to ask ourselves whether we are going to be followers of the way or proponents of some watered-down, misinterpreted version of Christianity.

12th Sunday after Pentecost Proper 14, Year B – Bill Harkins

The Collect

Grant to us, Lord, we pray, the spirit to think and do always those things that are right, that we, who cannot exist without you, may by you be enabled to live according to your will; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.

The Gospel: John 6:35, 41-51:

Jesus said, “I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never be hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty.”

Then the Jews began to complain about him because he said, “I am the bread that came down from heaven.” They were saying, “Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How can he now say, ‘I have come down from heaven’?” Jesus answered them, “Do not complain among yourselves. No one can come to me unless drawn by the Father who sent me; and I will raise that person up on the last day. It is written in the prophets, ‘And they shall all be taught by God.’ Everyone who has heard and learned from the Father comes to me. Not that anyone has seen the Father except the one who is from God; he has seen the Father. Very truly, I tell you, whoever believes has eternal life. I am the bread of life. Your ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. This is the bread that comes down from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.”

In the Name of the God of Creation who loves us all…Amen. Good morning friends, and welcome to Holy Family on this 12^th Sunday after Pentecost. On this Sunday when we hear another in a lovely series of references to the bread of life, invoking a theology of abundance, it is important to think about our responses to this invitation, and about the meaning of discipleship which flows from those compelling images and invitations.

“You are what you eat.” Most of us have heard this in one form or another all of our lives. As a life-long athlete, I get this. I know that when I am eating well—that is, when I am paying attention to what, how much, and when I eat—this is typically reflected in my performance. We try to instill in our children and loved ones wise eating habits, and we endeavor to set good examples for those whom we love. In today’s Gospel, Jesus offers his listeners one of the more perplexing of his sayings, the one about the need for people to eat his flesh and drink his blood, and he talks about the challenges involved for anyone who wanted to follow him. And we know that just a few verses later we find these words: “Many of his disciples turned back and no longer went about with him.” I find it intriguing that John uses the term “disciples” in this passage to describe those who turn back. These are not, as John Ortberg has noted in the Christian Century, just casual listeners. Rather, “these are the folk who have been teaching Sunday school and working in the nursery…and when long-time pillars of the church start leaving,” he writes, “we get restless.” So Jesus calls a meeting. And he puts the remarkably poignant question to them with an unsettling directness: Do you also wish to go away? I find myself wondering how Jesus asked the question. Was there sadness in his voice as he asked this of the disciples? Did the question have an edge to it—a hint of anger or disappointment? No doubt it was hard to see people upon whom he had counted as followers decide to leave

I found myself wondering this past week how I would have responded to the question. What does it mean to leave something one has come to believe in? And, how do we make judgments about leadership…the adequacy or inadequacy of it? How do we know when it is time to go away—to break, as it were, a covenant we have made, or how to respond when we feel betrayed by others in that covenant relationship? How do we know when to throw in the towel…to simply give up? These are difficult questions. And one wonders what they may have to do with Jesus’ invitation to drink his blood, and eat his flesh. Was Jesus speaking literally, or metaphorically? Those among his listeners who heard this as a literal command seemed most offended and confused. I think this is because they simply didn’t get the truth of what he was saying to them. This coming week we celebrate the Feast Day of Jonathon Myrick Daniels, who died while taking up the cross of justice in Alabama. He wrote, “The doctrine of the creeds, the enacted faith of the sacraments were the essential preconditions of the experience itself. The faith with which I went to Selma has not changed: it has grown…I began to know in my bones and sinews that I had been truly baptized into the Lord’s death and resurrection…with them, the black men and white men, with all life, in him whose Name is above all the names that the races and nations shout…We are indelibly and unspeakably one.”

As a runner, I have a strict code of ethics, if you will, about entering races: If I start one, short of injury or illness, I will finish. But what was at stake in this passage is much more than an athletic endeavor. It is about discipleship, and courage, and commitment, and faith, and it also speaks to the Gospel text for today, because it reveals that while the literal food we eat is important, the Bread of Christ is the most important source of sustenance in our lives.

Recently I read a wonderful book by Laura Hillenbrand, entitled “Unbroken,” about the life of Olympic runner Louis Zamperini. He was the son of Italian immigrants and Louis spoke no English when his family moved to California. A young man with behavior problems, his older brother Pete got him involved in the school track team as a way to divert his energy to something productive. In 1934 Zamperini set a world interscholastic record for the mile, clocking in at 00:04:21.2 at the preliminary meet to the state championships. The following week he won the championships with a 04:27.8, and that record helped Zamperini win a scholarship to the University of Southern California and eventually a place on the 1936 U.S. Olympic team in the 5000 metres, at 19 the youngest U.S. qualifier in that event. Zamperini finished eighth in the 5000 meter distance event at that Olympics. Two years later, in 1938, Zamperini set a national collegiate mile record which held for fifteen years, earning him the nickname “Torrance Tornado”.

Zamperini enlisted in the United States Army Air Forces in September 1941 and earned a commission as a second lieutenant the following August. He was deployed to the Pacific island of Funafuti as a bombardier assigned to a B-24 Liberator bomber. On May 27, 1943, he and his crew were assigned to conduct a search for a lost aircraft and its crew. While on the search, mechanical difficulties caused the plane to crash into the ocean 850 miles west of Oahu, killing eight of the eleven men aboard.

The three survivors, with little food and no water, subsisted on captured rainwater and small fish. On their 47th day adrift, Zamperini and Phillips reached land in the Marshall Islands and were immediately captured by the Japanese Navy. Both Phillips and Zamperini were held in captivity and severely beaten and mistreated until the end of the war in August, 1945. Zamperini was held in the Japanese Prisoner-of-war camp at Ōfuna for captives who were not registered as prisoners of war (POW). He was especially tormented by sadistic prison guard Mutsuhiro Watanabe (nicknamed “The Bird”), who was later included in General Douglas MacArthur’s list of the 40 most wanted war criminals in Japan. Zamperini wrote up Italian recipes keep the prisoners’ minds off the food and conditions. Zamperini had at first been declared missing at sea, and then, a year and a day after his disappearance, killed in action. When he eventually returned home he received a hero’s welcome.

In 1946 he married Cynthia Applewhite. After the war he suffered from what we would now call severe post traumatic stress disorder. Clinically depressed, and drinking too much, Zamperini attended a crusade led by evangelist Billy Graham. Graham later helped Zamperini launch a new career as a Christian inspirational speaker. His wife Cynthia was instrumental in getting him to go to Billy Graham’s meetings. In an Olympic related interview I saw last week, the interviewer asked Zamperini how he had turned his life around, and what kept him from giving up. He said: “forgiveness.” Over the years has visited many of the guards from his POW days to let them know that he has forgiven them. In October 1950, Zamperini went to Japan, gave his testimony and preached. The colonel in charge of the prison encouraged any of the prisoners who recognized Zamperini to come forward and meet him again. Zamperini threw his arms around each of them. Once again he explained the Gospel of forgiveness to them. “You can spend your life swallowing hatred and bitterness, and it will kill you,” he said. “I chose the Bread of Christ. I chose forgiveness, and it has given me life.”

Saying “yes’ to Jesus may not always be easy, or pleasant, or make sense, but it is who we are called to be. Christian discipleship  is embodied in our Baptismal prayer when we ask for an inquiring and discerning heart, the courage to will and persevere, and a sense of joy and wonder in all God’s works . Today’s Gospel reminds us that the Body of Christ is food that will not leave us hungry and unfulfilled. It is nourishment for the long run. It is Bread of life, for Life. If we hear Jesus’ words in the Gospel for today as a life-giving image, it can allow us to be fed in all times and in all places. So, just in case we haven’t “gotten it” after four weeks of bread-themed lessons, Jesus invites us into a way of living and being that is at once both wise and somewhat strange. It is wise by divine standards; in fact, it is not only wise but also “the way” to life abundant and everlasting.

Try to hear the words of Jesus from John’s Gospel without your “church” ears on, and the bare language is more than a bit challenging. “Very truly, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you”? Consuming Jesus doesn’t happen only at the altar rail. Living, breathing, and abiding in Christ’s body each hour of every day is our countercultural calling as Christians. We are to show Christ to the world through our words and actions, every day of our lives both individually and as worshiping communities. Having been fueled by Christ into full communion, we in turn offer the experience of his grace and boundless love to others. We become part of the heavenly food chain and the circle of endless and abundant life. Yes, dear one’s, we are what we eat. Yes, we feast on Christ at the table, but we must make our very lives a banquet of hope, grace, and love. We are stewards of the Good News and consumers of Christ. Together, let’s endeavor to live with a radical gratitude and a holy hunger, always willing to pull more chairs up to the table. If we are what we eat, then we have an opportunity to become that grace, ask for seconds of that abundant love, and pass the promises of God on to others. Amen.